A Rationale: Self-selection (motivated managers) could cause higher ratings regardless of training, explaining the observational study’s effect. Random assignment removes this bias. B would reduce difference, not explain it. C contradicts timeline. D is possible but less direct — and the study claimed no significant difference, not just power issue. E suggests industry difference, but A resolves via selection bias, the classic explanation for observational vs. RCT discrepancy.
A Rationale: Governor sees conviction rate rise and concludes waste, ignoring that absolute convictions likely fell. That is the classic proportion/absolute confusion. D is tempting but secondary; the core flaw is misinterpretation of rate vs. total. utopia verbal critical reasoning test (expert)
Which of the following conclusions best follows from applying the principle to the fact? C contradicts timeline
: Often features upbeat, topical content related to a hypothetical "media pack," which might include magazine articles, publisher information, and sample reports. Test Format and Structure RCT discrepancy
This content mimics the highest difficulty tier (resembling McKinsey PST, GMAT 700+, or Law Admission Test (LNAT) advanced sections).