Tabelog Robots.txt -

User-agent: * Disallow: /search/ Disallow: /rgsearch/ Disallow: /kw/ Disallow: /syop/ Disallow: /rr/ Disallow: /list/ Disallow: /rvw/ Disallow: /photo/ Disallow: /map/ Disallow: /guide/ Disallow: /sitemap/ Disallow: /navi/ Disallow: /rank/ Disallow: /shop/%A5%EA%A5%B9%A5%C8 Disallow: /bshop/ Disallow: /rstd/ Disallow: /west/ Disallow: /tokyo/ Disallow: /osaka/ Disallow: /aichi/ Disallow: /kyoto/ Disallow: /hyogo/ Disallow: /hokkaido/ Disallow: /fukuoka/ Disallow: /miyagi/ Disallow: /chiba/ Disallow: /saitama/ Disallow: /kanagawa/ Disallow: /shizuoka/ Disallow: /hiroshima/

Would you like a technical breakdown of how to ethically monitor Tabelog changes without violating their robots.txt ?

: Tabelog's infrastructure is known for being highly sensitive to high-frequency requests, quickly triggering CAPTCHAs or permanent bans. tabelog robots.txt

| Want to crawl? | Allowed? | |----------------|----------| | Restaurant detail pages | ✅ (implicitly, via no explicit block) | | Search results | ❌ | | Review pages | ❌ | | Photo galleries | ❌ | | Regional index pages | ❌ | | Ranking lists | ❌ |

A restaurant consultant wanting to analyze the top 50 Yakiniku restaurants in Osaka. | Allowed

This feature could be sold as a add-on for B2B SaaS platforms operating in the Japanese food and beverage sector, promising data compliance in a strictly regulated digital environment.

For a site built on user contributions and openness, Tabelog’s robots.txt is remarkably closed. But that’s the point. In a market where restaurant data is a strategic asset (competitors include Google Maps, Retty, and Gurunavi), a robots.txt becomes a legal-engineering hybrid: “We’ve told you not to crawl these paths. If you do, you’re violating our terms and potentially the Unfair Competition Prevention Act of Japan.” For a site built on user contributions and

A surprising omission. A robots.txt often points to sitemap.xml . Tabelog’s doesn’t. Either they rely on Google Search Console’s submitted sitemaps, or they deliberately avoid publicizing their URL structure. Given the number of blocked paths, the latter feels intentional.

Tabelog’s robots.txt is not about politeness. It’s about . They want Google to index their restaurant detail pages (the core content users need), but not the scaffolding that makes those pages discoverable in bulk.

While the specific content of Tabelog’s robots.txt can change to reflect new site features, it typically includes these standard fields: How Google Interprets the robots.txt Specification